Comment Difficult subject: the only reference is an article written by the interested person itself. we could think of self-promotion. Besides, he could have smiled.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question@Jaqen: shouldn't the scope (and the Category) be "Paolo Guerrieri Paleotti"? At least that's how he's called in the wikipedia articles and on the website of the Senato della Repubblica … Apart from that, I think all relevant criteria are met: being a professor and member of the senate makes him notable enough, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 08:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jaqen: Well, I guess there would be good arguments for and against any versions of the name. But if he's known under that name I'm OK with that. Could you maybe add a few words to the file description explaining who he is (Senator of X since YYYY …)? --El Grafo (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
