Question Why not? When I look at the map it seems like the road is actually about 800m south east of the location you have indicated? If that is correct it should be possible to provide a heading assuming you recall if you were looking North-West ot South-East. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is your view on the nominators statement saying that the colors on this original are more representative of the place, than the more colorful edit? Which is most valued: The most true representation or the prettiest ;-) ? -- Slaunger (talk) 09:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant support Hm... had to think about this for while. In the edit you state that one of the characteristics of this national park is that is is more dry than many others. The only other image I could find on Commons from this shows an elephant walking on green grass, which gives quite an alternative view of the characteristics of this national park. However, I also acknowledge that there are always regional and seasonal variances, which means that both representations are relevant. In the image here we better see the landscape as well as the characteristic mountains in the area in the background. I would have been nice, if there had been animals visible on the image, as that is for me a quite important aspect of having a national park. I prefer this original as compared to the edit, because the creator himself states this is a more faithful representation of the scenery. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Are you sure? Have you read the nominators view on this? It may be the prettiest, but does that imply that it is the most valued? -- Slaunger (talk) 09:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
