Support Personally I prefer full body photos of persons rather than just portraits. But I must say that for the purpose og illustrating an infobox a smaller portrait fits better. And as a portrait of Juan Carlos I this is a rahter good one - especially when reminding how hard it can be to find free images of such persons. Furthermore I also think this bright version looks a bit better than the edited dark version. --EPO16:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info When voting, please remember to check the status and update if needed, as that controls the border colour. Thanks. --MichaelMaggs20:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMO it is a non-place related shot/studio-like (it could be anywhere) and thus mitigated as mentioned explicitly for this criterion. I do not htink it adds much value where the portrait was taken. -- Slaunger14:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely valuable. It shows an important and notable member of the Spanish royal family. This man has a wide influence so the scope of the VI should be one of Juan Carlos in particular rather than the whole Spanish royal family. The value of this photo alone is enough for Chavez to shut up! :-) [1]Freedom to share19:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
