A rather delicate work by Kronheim, with interesting use of colours and inks. Other possible scopes: Bridal theology, Baxter process. I don't think Revelation 22:17 merits a scope on its own, though. -- Adam Cuerden (talk)
Well, I linked every Baxter process user I could find a category for to it. There's probably some uncategorised stuff I missed, but that's always true, isn't it? Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Difficult. What characteristics make an illustration printed with Baxter process recognizable at the VI review size, and different from another process?--Myrabella (talk) 09:04, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's mainly to do with the use of colours - the Baxter process allows some very delicate colours, such as the very pale periwinkle of the sky, and with the usage of non-standard inks like the silver (not that that shiny inks can really show up in a digitization. That sort of thing isn't easily reproducable with any of the other processes I can think of off-hand. In addition, of course, one can click on it to zoom in and note how the Baxter process allows different styles to be combined: The pale inks use a different style than the stipple engraving of the yellow, the black is line engraving, etc, etc. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With this explanation, I believe that characteristica are distinguishable in images for experienced viewers. Since some other examples have quality issues, I Support this. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
