Commons:Valued image candidates/Jacint Verdaguer Monument.JPG

Jacint Verdaguer Monument.JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Pere prlpz (talk) on 2012-07-24 23:29 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Monument a Verdaguer (Barcelona)
Used in	Global usage en:Plaça de Mossèn Jacint Verdaguer, Barcelona, ca:Llista de monuments de l'Eixample de Barcelona#Monuments d'Interès Local and others
Reason	It's the best image to match all criteria. -- Pere prlpz (talk)
Review (criteria)	Support Small change in the syntax of scope. Best in scope all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)  Comment You nominated interesting photos but please, write more information about the object in the description of the file. What is this? Where is it located?--MrPanyGoff 21:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC) This is a monument in Barcelona to a Catalan poet. The monument is listed as a cultural heritage monument. Some information about it can be found at the city council http://w10.bcn.cat/APPS/cat_patri/editElement.do?reqCode=inspect&id.identificador=1467&id.districte=02 (in catalan), and you can also read en:Plaça de Mossèn Jacint Verdaguer, Barcelona.--Pere prlpz (talk) 23:35, 27 July 2012 (UTC)  Oppose To satisfy the criterion 4, full description of the object depicted and its location written with words has to be added in the description field of the image page. What is this? This is a monument not a poet. Whose monument is this? Where is this monument located? ...and in case there is some info When this monument was built? Cheers! One of the hidden meanings of this project is to tidy the house ;) --MrPanyGoff 09:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)  Comment I wonder why is this demonstration of stubbornness instead of easily fixing the problem. OK, I'm going to do it for you in order to proceed this otherwise good nomination.--MrPanyGoff 08:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)  Support The description is adjusted. Now the criterion 4 is satisfied. It takes a minute or two.--MrPanyGoff 08:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)