Commons:Valued image candidates/Holzwaschmaschine im Piringebirge.jpg

Holzwaschmaschine im Piringebirge.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Reneman (talk) on 2017-11-10 12:35 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Natural water-powered wood washing machine for clothes
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment - Both the scope and the Commons category seem too narrow to me. Shouldn't think be nominated simply as "wooden washing machine" or "outdoor wooden washing machine" at the most? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment: The "machine" in Category:Wooden washing machines is not of the same sort/typ/other functionality/workingmode. -- Reneman (talk) 17:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment - OK, understood, but your current scope doesn't link to any Commons category, and it has to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment: According to the instructions, I should only specify a relevant category, if no relevant category exists, do not specify one. Since I have not found a suitable category, I do not specify one. --Reneman (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC) If nothing else, "Washing machine" could be a relevant category to link to part of the scope, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment: Comparison: the photo "Wooden car" must be nominated in the Category:Automobiles. and note: the car does not work like other cars with normal fuel, but with water. My wood-washing machine works by the power of the flowing water of a stream. Not with electricity. According to the instructions: "Otherwise, don't link". --Reneman (talk) 07:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks, noted. I'd like guidance from someone else like User:Archaeodontosaurus or User:DeFacto who is a longtimer at VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Gladly. Thank you for your support. :) --Reneman (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment There is nothing in the rules that allows us to reject this appointment. But the scope that does not have to be multilingual, where there is no link to the category, added to the character of this object is difficult to classify makes labeling very difficult. A new scope could unlock the situation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment, I think the problem is the correct categorisation of this image. If the image is well categorised at an appropriate level, as required in the VI rules, there will surely be a suitable category to link the scope to. If I wanted a scope to be, say, "natural water-powered wooden clothes washing machine", then I would create that category and add it to all the appropriate other categories or images that I could find. Commons is growing, and not all categories have been created yet. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment - Thanks, guys. Your move, Reneman, and I definitely agree that your scope should be in only one language, because why 2, rather than 10? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment: Many thanks, i changed the scope to englich. My English is not the best, so I don't dare to create a new category structure in this case. --Reneman (talk) 11:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)