Commons:Valued image candidates/Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg

**declined**
Image
Nominated by	B.p. on 12:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail)
Used in	Global usage da:Vinbjergsnegl, fr:Helix pomatia, nl:Wijngaardslak
Review (criteria)	InfoThis was another competitor in natural environment. And with natural light (no flash). B.p. 12:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] Comment I saw, but the orientation of the shell is not very good, even if the light is more natural. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] Archaeo, is there any reason you didn't select File:Helix pomatia 89a.jpg here which you added at Helix pomatia? J Kadavoor J e e 14:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] Comment The orientation does not convey false information which the flash light in the other image certainly does. B.p. 18:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] Comment I'm not convinced by the argumentation just above, and this one "does not illustrate the subject well" enough, imo: I would like to see the Helix better...--Jebulon (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope) 2. Helix pomatia 002.JPG: +1 3. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0 <-- => File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Helix pomatia 002.JPG: Promoted. File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined. <-- --Myrabella (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu