Deutsch: Dieses Bild zeigt wohl am Besten die Beleuchtung der Grubenlampe auf der Halde Rheinpreußen, Moers. Dieses Rot wird abends zeitweise angestellt, wie auch einige Lampen auf der Halde (ein Paar von diesen sind im Hintergrund zu erkennen). Nur zur Erklärung des Scopes :-)
English: It's the best picture which shows the special lightnig of the mining lamp on the Halde Rheinpreußen. At evenings the lamp (and some lamps behind it (you can see some)) is lighting in a red light. Maybe now the scope becomes clearer to you.
Okay. Dschwen hat mich schon auf die Unpraktibilität von meiner Vorlage hingewiesen, ich bastel gerade an der normalen Version für mich. Ich werde sobald wie möglich die Vorlagen tauschen. Den normalen Koordinaten-Baustein füg ich trotzdem schon mal ein. Damit sollte das Problem behoben sein. --kaʁstnDisk/Cat21:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Opposebut will be re-evaluated if the issues are fixed.
Criteria 2 + 3 : note that for buildings, "in general, the VI for a building scope should be a daylight picture" and it can apply to works of art as high as building, I guess. I willingly recognize that this one is particular and that it is very noticeable to see the lamp by night, lighting like a true lamp. It is why I would suggest a set with two of your images (daylight / by night). Side comment: have a look at the draft of new rules for VI sets under discussion ; I think you could match them rather well.
Criterion 2: Please format the scope as usual: a single scope in English, with a link somewhere to Category:Halde Rheinpreußen
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Categorys and scope are fixed. I want to go to the Halde Rheinpreußen in summer again. Then I can try to make a collage. But for now are not good enough pictures for montage, sorry. --kaʁstnDisk/Cat10:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question Thanks. The new scope is OK to me: for this very special monument, a night scope can be suitable. I am ready to support. Just a small confirmation needed. About the set, it's up to you. I'd just like to be sure that we speak of the same thing when we say "a set". No need of a photomontage, it is just a selection of several images. See this example of a VI set. --Myrabella (talk) 12:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
oh, I thought at a photomontage. Okay. But we haven't still two images which were good enough. I try to make two (or more) images at similar position at diffrent times in summer, okay? --kaʁstnDisk/Cat12:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd rather support a set with 2 views (daylight/by night). But considering your answer above, OK, let's wait for the set. I support this one now, because firstly, a "by night" scope seems acceptable here, it highlights (if I may say) the originality of this contemporary work of art; secondly per Ikar.us, the nominated image is the most illustrative among the available ones; thirdly, I'm glad to be allowed to promote a picture about contemporary art (no FOP in France...). --Myrabella (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Scope changed from 
