Commons:Valued image candidates/File:Aerial image of the Ampfing-Waldkraiburg airfield.jpg

File:Aerial image of the Ampfing-Waldkraiburg airfield.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Contributers2020Talk to me here on 2021-09-10 07:36 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Ampfing-Waldkraiburg airfield aerial view.
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Exceptional image of the Ampfing-Waldkraiburg airfield at the aerial view.. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 07:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC) -- Contributers2020Talk to me here
Review (criteria)	Comment As I have already said, you cannot vote for your own image: you have to remove your vote, so that it can be taken to be valid. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC) Please note that you have already been the subject of a report for having also violated the rules for closing images. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)  Comment This is not a self-vote, just a badly-drafted nomination. Fixed. Rodhullandemu (*talk) 08:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)  Comment Not fixed, because although the nominator didn't vote for their own image, their signature improperly appears after the supporting vote. Please fix that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)  Comment As the author of the image, I feel compelled to intervene because I don't want my image to be tainted by an improper process. @Rodhullandemu: I could imagine that Contributers2020's (IMO) improper use of the BIS template in the reason field misled you into believing that his/her stated reason was actually a vote. Was that the case? Anyway, I have tried to fix the nomination. --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)  Info I'm really sorry for all the mistakes I have done @Carsten Steger: , @Archaeodontosaurus: , @Ikan Kekek: . I'll promise I'll not make any other mistakes in this field. Also I have filed my signature and also fixed the BIS template. Really sorry again. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 09:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC) Don't worry; there's still time to consider the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC) I'm sure no one thinks you wanted to cheat, on the contrary as you can see: everyone comes to your aid. At this stage nothing is against the vote. The vote will be closed in the usual way. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)