Comment It is said that „Estación del Norte“ is the former name and now it is named „Príncipe Pío train station”? Also we usually add „(exterior)” at the end of the scope.--MrPanyGoff20:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Formerly this was the station's main entrance. Actually we have this facade closed (and quite abandoned) and only part of the old station is in service (named Príncipe Pío and only for metro and short-distance trains, not long-distance as it was before). The rest of the building, which facade was restored, is a shopping centre, also named Príncipe Pío. I don't think we should add "exterior" to the scope, because interior would now be "Príncipe Pío" and not Estación del Norte. --Kadellar (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't. It is just the old facade. The only valid pictures for the category are pictures of this old facade and older pictures from the time when it really was Estación del Norte (North Station). I nominated it because I think it is the best one showing how the building looks like. --Kadellar (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I just wonder how to treat it as a matter of categorisation in this project, otherwise, for me it is a good valuable document of a notable building.--MrPanyGoff17:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we can split the existing category in two: Recent pictures of the old building and then Historical pictures of the station. We'd get this picture in the first one. Would it be easier then for the project's categorisation system? What do you think? --Kadellar (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well, finally I find it as best in its category which is a certain scope of a notable building. The new transformation of the structure is to be in a separated scope.--MrPanyGoff12:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
