A quality image of mine; I wonder if it also fits the criteria for our valued images? Description: "Dolphins at Loro Parque, in Tenerife island (Spain)." -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul PiotrusTalk
Comment The chosen scope isn't suitable IMO. I would suggest to create a new Commons category: "Category:Jumping cetaceans" that would be a sub category of Category:Jumping animals and of Category:Cetacea, to sort the images on Commons that may be classified in that new category (I can give a hand ;-), and to nominate your image with this new scope, linked to that new category. --Myrabella (talk) 13:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Changed category per your suggestion; as for geotagging, I tried adding the coordinates from en wiki article to our gallery at Loro Parque, but it defaults to NE, when it should be NW. I don't know how to fix it :( I don't have the exact geo coordinates of where I took the photo - should we use the gallery coordinates, once we fix the NE/NW issue? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul PiotrusTalk18:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected the geotag of the gallery, as it pointed to a desert place in Lybia ;-). I've also added a possible geotag in your image - please check if it is plausible. --Myrabella (talk) 21:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The review itself, now :-): this image is nice, but I tend to prefer that one for illustrating the scope because it shows the animals face on. So I am going to set up a Most Valued Review (MVR). --Myrabella (talk) 08:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
