Commons:Valued image candidates/Dolphins Loro Parque BW 1.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dolphins Loro Parque BW 1.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Berthold Werner (talk) on 2010-01-29 18:41 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jumping dolphins
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)
  • I like this one, makes a good companion to the two others (mine) nominated above; this one has no humans - just animals. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support The competition is pretty hard but among the nominated images. I think this one (marginally) illustrates the scope best as I find the presence of humans in some competing photos a little distracting. Another aspect of tis MVR is the scope which I thought about for a while is the plural dolphins. Maybe a singular "jumping dolphin" would have been just as or perhaps slightly more relevant, as the added aspect of having several gives less detals to show the actual jump of an animal in review size. On the other hand the plural gives the added element of the synchronous jump of several dolphins, which I find fascinating. Finally, I think the categorization effort made in relation to this MVR is a good piece of spin-off work (thanks for doing that), which is an asset of this project. --Slaunger (talk) 21:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 01:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
MVR scores:
Commons:Valued image candidates/Dolphins at Loro Parque 13.JPG: 0
Commons:Valued image candidates/Dolphins at Loro Parque 04-crop.JPG: 0
Commons:Valued image candidates/Dolphins Loro Parque BW 1.jpg: +2 <--
Commons:Valued image candidates/Dolphins Loro Parque BW 4.jpg: 0
Results:
File:Dolphins at Loro Parque 13.JPG: Declined
File:Dolphins at Loro Parque 04-crop.JPG: Declined
File:Dolphins Loro Parque BW 1.jpg: Promoted <--
File:Dolphins Loro Parque BW 4.jpg: Declined
--Slaunger (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]