Martinvl: there is no way that is a better representation, this is just one angle and the candidate offers 360° view of this polyhedron, you are assuming that people have the ability to comprehend the whole object by one face, that is not true by the most of polyhedrons and for the most part of society (you can find studies about that, I don't remember the name in English for understand three-dimensional objects), we have to have the highest educational value, and the candidate is offering this. And this " Remember, this is a VI submission, not a QI submission. " was not necessary, and rude. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m20:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rodrigo.ArgentonI disagree with your assertion. The diagram that I prefer clearly shows the three types of polyhedra that make up the snub dodecahedron - pentagons are in red, triangles that join the pentagons are in yellow and triangles that only touch the pentagons are in blue. The image that you are promoting i snowhere near as clear in showing this structure. Martinvl (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is not formed by three types polygons, this is formed by only two, 12 pentagons and 80 equilateral triangles. This 3 colours diagram, with no proper description mislead the reader, and again, you are assuming that any person will see one face and understand that pattern... this is not true. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m21:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
