Commons:Valued image candidates/Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg

Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	Bgag (talk) on 2008-06-16 16:07 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Furcifer oustaleti (Oustalet's chameleon) female
Used in	Global usage en:Malagasy Giant Chameleon,fr:Furcifer, nl:Oustalet's kameleon
Review (criteria)	Support(Added support vote as that seems clearly to be the intention. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC))Meets all six criteria. --norro 14:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC) Result: 1 support => Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)  Question How do we seek to remove this and have new nominations for male (we already have female VI)? Charles (talk) 11:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)  Comment We must go through Pending Most Value review candidates and offer a male or female scope to erase this promotion and promote a good image with a correct scope. Badly designed scopes give this type of problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)  Question - Is this one male or female? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment female. Charles (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks. This photo should probably be nominated in the scope "Furcifer oustaleti, female". Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg: +2 => File:Caméléon Madagascar 02.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg: Promoted. ---- DeFacto (talk). 22:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)  Support as best in current scope. Thanks for nominating the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment, this nomination isn't properly presented - this specific image was superseded as the VI in this scope, in an MVR, by File:Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male Montagne d’Ambre.jpg on 18 January 2019 (it has a "This image is a former valued image" banner on it). For the current VI to be replaced, another MVR would be required. -- DeFacto (talk). 09:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment I've tried to do it but I can't. I've had to modify this MVR. --Bgag (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC) @Bgag: read, and follow, the instructions here: Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review. If they aren't clear enough, please ask again. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC) It's not a competition between two nominations. It's a new one. This is for the female chameleon. The other was the male chameleon. --Bgag (talk) 16:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment As noted above Bgag Ikan Kekek , we already have VI for female, so must use MVR. And what makes you think this is a female? This is a male. Charles (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment Sorry I didn't know there was already à VI for male and female. I withdraw this nomination.--Bgag (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)