Commons:Valued image candidates/Boscia foetida.jpg

Boscia foetida.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Lycaon (talk) on 2009-03-17 09:35 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Boscia foetida (Smelly shepherd's tree) leaves
Used in	Global usage de:Stinkbusch, en:Hardap Dam, es:Boscia, pt:Boscia
Review (criteria)	Support What choice do we have? ;) It's the only one of this species we have. It's a good photo too. The only complaint I have is that it doesn't really give you an idea of what the whole tree looks like. It's a lot different than something like this, but I guess the foliage here is the interesting part. Rocket000 (talk) 10:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC) You always have the choice to state that, though most of the criteria are fulfilled and it is the only available image, it still doesn't (according to the assessor) illustrate the topic sufficiently for it to be a valued image... ;-). Lycaon (talk) 11:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC) And indeed, the xeric leaves are typical of this plant. Lycaon (talk) 11:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Then I think there should be a subscope here. The current picture gives no idea about what the entire plant looks like. --Eusebius (talk) 11:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)  Oppose As I sense we are now converging on a general acceptance of subscopes when...it is a distinguishing feature or notable characteristic of the species according to the relevant literature., I'd say a leaves subscope is better. I don't need literature references though. And yes, I know that is another standard than i had just before in Commons:Valued image candidates/Genista corsica (flowers).jpg, but that was before this discussion. --Slaunger (talk) 22:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)vote cancelled after scope change. --Slaunger (talk) 08:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Scope changed from Boscia foetida (Smelly shepherd's tree) to Boscia foetida (Smelly shepherd's tree) leaves Lycaon (talk) 08:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support OK for me now. --Slaunger (talk) 08:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)  Support Even better. Rocket000 (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Result: 2 support => Promoted. --Slaunger (talk) 21:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)