Commons:Valued image candidates/1956JaguarD-TypeLongNose.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1956JaguarD-TypeLongNose.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Myrabella (talk) on 2010-08-27 20:41 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaguar D-Type
Used in Global usage
Reason This image depicts a Jaguar D-Type in action (it recalls that this model was a race car), including its oval "mouth", and the vertical stabiliser behind the driver's head. -- Myrabella (talk)
Review
(criteria)
  •  Support Agree with Myrabella. Yann (talk) 04:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Of course I saw this one when I proposed the other... I prefer the green, because... it is green ! Furthermore, the green one doesn't need a recall as a car race, it looks so (see the white circle for the race number), and the vertical stabiliser is visible too, as it is behind the driver's head. A full profile view looks better to me, because it shows better the size, but it's unsolvable matter of taste. The blue one could be the best in a scope "Jaguar D-Type in action", maybe, but it suffers of motion blur too hardly to be a good competitor. At the end, its only advantage is :" look : it rolls ". (But the one in Paris rolls too, I saw it and spoke with his happy owner.)--Jebulon (talk) 13:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Depicting a running car isn't the only difference. Another one is that this image shows the front of the car, with its central oval hole. You could answer that the slender back is important too :-) --Myrabella (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Yes I could ! I don't understand why this "central oval hole" is so important. This is only an aeration hole, like in all other cars... ;)--Jebulon (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Jaguar D-type Paris 2010.jpg: +1
2. 1956JaguarD-TypeLongNose.jpg: +2 <--
=>
File:Jaguar D-type Paris 2010.jpg: Declined.
File:1956JaguarD-TypeLongNose.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Ikar.us (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]