Commons:Valued image candidates/08.12.01 01 Conjuction of the Moon, Venus & Jupiter.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

08.12.01 01 Conjuction of the Moon, Venus & Jupiter.JPG

undecided
Image
Nominated by Ikar.us (talk) on 2010-07-02 00:20 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astronomic conjunction
Used in Global usage
Reason Three objects very near together. Both planets were very bright, the constellation must have been eye-catching. -- Ikar.us (talk)
Review
(criteria)
  •  Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 4 (is not fully described on the image page). I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. --Myrabella (talk) 14:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. And added to reason. --Ikar.us (talk) 14:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Comment Better now. Personally I'd prefer an image with a ground reference for the scope, but another thing bothers me in that image: the weak information on author (not tagged "own work" e.g.) and license; it hasn't a Creative Commons license or other of the recommended licenses on Commons, but an unusual {{Attribution}}. And the date and hour of the original upload log doesn't match very well with the EXIF date and time (an issue of time reference I guess). --Myrabella (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Mercury, Venus and the Moon Align.jpg: 0
2. 08.12.01 01 Conjuction of the Moon, Venus & Jupiter.JPG: 0 <--
3. Moon and Venus conjunctions.jpg: 0
3. Moon-venus-jupiter-2.jpg: 0
=>
File:Mercury, Venus and the Moon Align.jpg: Undecided.
File:08.12.01 01 Conjuction of the Moon, Venus & Jupiter.JPG: Undecided. <--
File:Moon and Venus conjunctions.jpg: Undecided.
File:Moon-venus-jupiter-2.jpg: Undecided.
--Ikar.us (talk) 12:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]