Commons:Valued image candidates/(Toulouse) Danseur à l'écharpe - Royaume de Champa (Vietnam) - Musée Labit.jpg

(Toulouse) Danseur à l'écharpe - Royaume de Champa (Vietnam) - Musée Labit.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-15 06:07 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Danseur dit à l'écharpe Royaume de Champa (Vietnam), Musée Georges Labit Toulouse
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) red link in category hierarchy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC) I suspect Danseur à l'écharpe is a good scope. Is it a scarf dance? It's not her who's the scarf, is it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) The wording shows that the title is assumed by the museum but it is not official --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Their mistake. We shouldn't promulgate it. The scarf dance is a big thing in Vietnam. Can you change it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)  Oppose Misleading title. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)  Comment We do not discuss the title of the titles of the works which are given by the museums --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)  Support I think Archaeodontosaurus has a point. The title of the museum is leading.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)  Comment The English title in the image page "Dancer called with a scarf" is strange. Could you please clarify whether this English title is displayed in the museum? If not, better translations are "Dancer with a scarf" or "Scarf dancer". (Disclaimer: I do not know French, I've consulted DeepL.com and my wife who is fluent in English and French.) --Tagooty (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC) @Tagooty: Hi. The title in French contains a Gallicism. The title not having been given by the author, it was the museum curator who named it: the dancer with the scarf; but to mark that he is the author of this title he added said to the scarf. For me, I try not to take the liberty of interpreting museum data. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Thanks for the clarification. Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 06:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)