Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Xanthoria parietina (06 03 31).jpg

Image:Xanthoria parietina (06 03 31).jpg - not featured

•  Nominate

Fine specimen, excellent quality. —A.J. 10:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

•  Support —A.J. 10:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support--Shizhao 13:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the greenish one more. At any rate, it seems like a very standard photo of a "common" lichen. I think even I could manage to focus on moss. :P pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- skINMATE 19:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Urban 04:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support-- Lycaon 10:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lerdsuwa 14:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quite good, but neither outstanding nor difficult to photograph. So FP-status requires a higher degree of sharpness. MGo 15:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack with MGo, needs some optimizing too (CA, Sharpness).Darkone 18:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose too soft Pjotr 10:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Comment. Ok, so this is my photo, uploaded on request of A.J., who found it among my flickr photos. He was so kind to nominate it here. You have had years to shoot a photo of one of the most common lichens around. It is really growing around the corner of each of your houses. All what you have been able to produce is visible at Xanthoria parietina. If you can do it better, then do so. As has been stated, it is really not that hard to focus on moss. But I don't think I like to read some of the comments above. Taka 13:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support why should an excellent photo be difficult to photograph? --Ayacop 14:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support its hard to present a simple subject well then to present a diffcult subject Gnangarra 15:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose What Elise said... --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 22:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

6 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral --> not featured Roger McLassus 16:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)