Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Vienna Teng 3.jpg

Info created by Frederick Manligas Nacino - uploaded by Frederick Manligas Nacino - nominated by Frederick Manligas Nacino --Opusdeiphotography 22:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Opusdeiphotography 22:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 02:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment and Question Very nice composition and especially light is very good on the artist. The photo has a nice atmosphere. One concern: I find that the photo is not that sharp. On the other hand it has almost no noise (which is of course good). Has noise reduction postprocessing been applied to such an extent that it has compromised the sharpness? I could accept a little noise if the artist thereby got sharper. -- Slaunger 07:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - That is exactly my concern. The face has lost all detail and I suspect that was the result of denoising. It is a shame because the composition and light are superb. I might review my vote though, depending on the explanations and the possibility of an improved version (I suspect there will be quite some discussion about this pic...) - Alvesgaspar 07:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I'm a huge fan of Vienna Teng and her piano (yup, even in France, I know her !) and am therefore very happy to see this picture here. In addition, the composition is so superb that I can only support. Buuuut exactly as above, I think the picture is tooooo soft, and completely agree that trading clean appearance against sharpness could be a good compromise. I remain neutral in the hope this is fixed. But really, I think I would support even if the picture isn't improved. Benh 09:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Questionwhy an user named opusdei etc...(in red)can vote? --Doalex 16:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)doalex[reply]
Support Good composition and athmosphere. Technical quality at FP margin. --Beyond silence 16:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Questionwhy an user named opusdei etc...(in red) can vote? --Doalex 16:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)I want to understand --Doalex 18:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If the link is red is just means that the user page for the Opusdeiphotography logon name is empty. It is nowhere required that you present anything on your userpage and it is not a requirement that you have anything on your user page to vote. It is just required that you have a profile and that you are logged in when signing the vote. I hope that answered your question.

+ok thank you, it's perhaps I don't like this user name....--Doalex 18:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose inferior technical quality. Lycaon 21:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good composition, but skin looks too unnatural due to noise reduction, and you can also see motion blur in the fingers. Dori | Talk 02:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The face is very blurred. --MichaelMaggs 15:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ack opposers. --Digon3 ^talk 19:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 17:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu