Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Trier Porta Nigra BW 1.JPG

Image:Trier Porta Nigra BW 1.JPG, not featured

•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose - a perfectly solid image, but unremarkable, and I find the cars and particularly the orange truck in front to be very distracting. R-T-C Tim (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose distracting cars --SuperJew (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Digital removal of the cars is I think not possible and physical could be also because of it is a road with traffic. :-) And as can be seen no better angle for shot is available. --Aktron (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

 Comment just because it is not possible and if it was it would be FP doesn't make it FP. My picture was turned down because of leaves covering the crocodiles feet and the background. Maybe they're were supposing I would just get down, move the crocodile to a better background (and hope not to get bitten on the way)? --SuperJew (talk) 13:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose, poor composition. Wouldn't it be a better idea to photograph it from the other side, perhaps? --Aqwis (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
  •  InfoThis side was build by the romans to impress their enemies and is therefore the more interesting (or main) side. For the other side look here --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

    The other side could also refer to something like this: Certainly a more dramatic view of the building. Haros (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

•  Support FP JukoFF (talk)
•  Support PMG (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- DarkAp89  Commons 08:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Jeses (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose per R-T-C Tim. Lycaon (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose As R-T-C Tim. --Karelj (talk) 19:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

result: 5 supports, 5 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)