Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:The Great wall - by Bernard Goldbach.jpg

Image:The Great wall - by Bernard Goldbach.jpg, Not Featured

•  Nominate

WεFt 18:59, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

•  Support WεFt 18:59, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose - sun glare, tilted horizon - MPF 20:50, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Neutral - Beautiful but grainy -- Fabien1309 22:21, 3 October 2005 (UTC) See next picture now. -- Fabien1309 23:38, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support -- it could be better if it was not grainy ! -- YolanC 10:54, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support The picture looks 100 times better downsized to 2048 pixels with despeckle filter applied. Despite that, it is a beautful image. -- ADSR6581 16:28, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose Grainy, sun glare. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 19:41, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 01:02, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Urban 05:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Neutral Beautiful picture, alas it is grainy, as has already been said — should be downsized. Grumpy Troll ^(talk) 14:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC).
•  'Oppose'unknow copyright status. the upload clamed that this pic is taken by a flickrer and is taken in 2005-02-09 13:17:20,it must be a lay, i leave in beijing for over 20 years and have never seen such green leaves in February and never seen no body stand on great wall in such a sunshine midday. By the green leaves and the angle of sunlight i conjecture this photo is taken in a summer morning before 6:00. Most improtant of all i have seen this photo many times in some chinese bbs before 2005, so i conclude the uploader tell a lay and the author and copyright statusof this photo is unknow.--Snowyowls 05:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

1 Support, 4 Oppose, 2 Neutral delete => Not Featured --Shizhao 16:41, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:The Great wall - by Bernard Goldbach with filter.jpg, Not Featured

What do you think about this one ?

300px|Filtered version

•  Nominate

-- Fabien1309 23:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

•  Support filtered version -- Fabien1309 13:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support this version. I think the lens flare helps the picture more than it hurts it. The wall texture comes out beautifully, and the perspective manages to convey a feeling of being there, which is what I want from this kind of picture.--Eloquence 13:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support Now it's perfect. :) -- ADSR6581 14:00, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support ACK ADSR6581 --SehLax 19:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support Rama 07:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support Grumpy Troll ^(talk) 16:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support -- YolanC 16:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support QuartierLatin1968 19:39, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support —FoeNyx 12:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
•  Support I've tested in my desktop. It is nice, indead. -PedroPVZ 23:14, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
•  'Oppose'unknow copyright status. the upload clamed that this pic is taken by a flickrer and is taken in 2005-02-09 13:17:20,it must be a lay, i leave in beijing for over 20 years and have never seen such green leaves in February and never seen no body stand on great wall in such a sunshine midday. By the green leaves and the angle of sunlight i conjecture this photo is taken in a summer morning before 6:00. Most improtant of all i have seen this photo many times in some chinese bbs before 2005, so i conclude the uploader tell a lay and the author and copyright statusof this photo is unknow.--Snowyowls 05:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • As I commented on Deletion Requests, this is one of several photos from China uploaded by the same person; I've asked him to confirm that he has taken it himself. If you can find the same photo on the web somewhere, that would be pretty solid confirmation that it's a copyright violation. In the meantime, I suggest that we give Bernhard some time to respond.--Eloquence 18:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

10 Support, 1 Oppose.  Deletionrequest =>Not  Featured--Shizhao 16:37, 21 October 2005 (UTC)