Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ross Bridge.jpg

Image:Ross Bridge.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2008 at 00:29:28

•  Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by User:Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Noodle snacks (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversaturated and unrealistic air. Blue left, grey middle, white right??? Not my cup of tea. Lycaon (talk) 00:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- I've seen worse pictures becoming fp. Manuel R. (talk) 18:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support a very powerful picture ; the sky is stunning indeed. The slightly harsh contrast and oversaturated details would have killed another picture, they just add to the strength of this one and make the bridge and church stand out even more. --JY Rehby (talk) 01:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support like Rehby --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Nice colors and composition. --Aktron (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Nice work, beautiful sky. -- TheWB (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Another great Noodle snacks photo - excellent work! How do you turn this on (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I must agree with Lycaon, the sky is a little bit strange but I am really attracted to this image and I like the details.   ■ MMXX^talk  14:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, it looks unreal. So what? Photography is (also) an art. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment I didn't say that the sky is problem, I also believe that photography is an art and art is not like a cement block, inflexible, thats why I supported this image.   ■ MMXX^talk  05:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Info In the interests of full disclosure a small level correction has been performed since the nomination started Noodle snacks (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• Isn't tilted? --Beyond silence 23:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
  • I think it was by like a degree or so, have a look at the image revisions, the change is only very minor. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
    • I think you did well to correct this. I had the intimate feeling it was tilted ; i finally convinced myself that it was not, that it was an effect of perspective. Now it looks (even !) much better. --JY Rehby (talk) 23:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support How to turn an ordinary subject into an incredible picture ! You have the touch for sure. Benh (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--CPacker (talk) 19:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose As lycaon --Pom² (talk) 23:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose As above + not pleasant dimensions of photo (ratio of x and y). --Karelj (talk) 15:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Georgez (talk) 14:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Simonizer (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

 result: 16 support, 3 opposes, 0 neutral => featured. Lycaon (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)