Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Red billed gull-02.jpg

*

Info created by Tony Wills - uploaded by Tony Wills - nominated by D-Kuru --D-Kuru 13:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support --D-Kuru 13:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice eyes, beautiful --Makro Freak 13:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice technique at maintaining the whites through underexposure. The shadows are fine and make the image look natural. -- Ram-Man 04:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Vmenkov 04:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Winiar^✉ 15:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jina Lee 16:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tony Wills 12:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 21:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info added a slight edit with more lighning on the birds left side (right side for the observer), plus popped the background a bit, plus Macrofreak sharpening --Makro Freak 18:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support (second version) It was a surprise to see this here, good job on smoothing that background :-) --Tony Wills 20:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Its is nice in thumb size but the flaws are clearly visible when we enlarge it. There is little detail in the white body of the bird: the lighted part looks overexposed and the darker part is noisy. - Alvesgaspar 22:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tone is much better on the original. There is no need to lighten the shadows here. -- Ram-Man 04:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't really like the pose and framing, quality is ok but not great MichaD 16:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There's rely nothing special I see in this picture. Maybe I'm missing something.--Steinninninn 09:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer 14:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu