Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Raspberries02.jpg

Image:Raspberries02.jpg not featured

I love how this turned out - makes a beautiful simple desktop b/g

• Self Nom --Fir0002 www 21:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - really nice --Buchling 21:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose - great, but I don't know about the spacing between the foreground and the background raspberries -- the background seems too blured and become distracting. I also think that some photoshop levels correction should be applied here as the berries look a bit washed. Great pic though, I'm just not 100% there. -Quasipalm 21:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not even to two raspberries in the foreground are really sharp, let alone the others, which show bad compression artefacts - and the colours are not convincing either. Calderwood 22:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support--Shizhao 02:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Sorry, again, I would support if the title was something like "depth of field". But this does not show raspberries. If it did, there would not be distracting blurry things in the background, and the raspberries would be at the centre of the image. Rama 09:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Joonasl 09:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support The title is just a placeholder. The image speaks for itself! pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose boring Kessa Ligerro 14:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Urban 05:20, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose. villy ♦✎ 07:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Mayamaxima 15:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Quasipalm -- Solipsist 08:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tbc 21:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC) I agree with Rama
• Question: Where did the other raspberries-picture go? Calderwood 16:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't quite follow you...--Fir0002 [http://www.photos.flagstaffotos.com

www] 10:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

•  Oppose MGo 10:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like this more than the newer one, just need a bit more of DOF. Francisco M. Marzoa 20:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

4 support, 10 oppose, 1 neutral --> not featured Roger McLassus 17:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)