Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pepsi in India.jpg

Image:Pepsi in India.jpg not featured

•  Info created by Claude Renault on flickr.com — uploaded by TheBernFiles — nominated by TheBernFiles
•  Support TheBernFiles 15:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose - don't want to support pepsi ads - MPF 22:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, if anything it's a commentary on the impact of first-world products in a third-world country; I doubt Pepsi would use this image as an ad. See Pepsi in India on Wikipedia. TheBernFiles 06:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

•  Support - Actually, the pic contains 2 ads, but the whole image would not work as an ad.--Javierme 16:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the idea, but actually there's missing the kick norro 19:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral. Nice juxtaposition of poverty and first world branding, but I fail to see how the image comments on the impact of first-world products. Is the woman poor because of Pepsi? Sorry, but this smells a little of POV and using this image in Pepsi in India is a bit questionable. --Dschwen 20:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose — If the subject is the women then the signs are too dominant, if the subject is the signs then they are cut, if the subject is suppose to be both then its POV, POV implies that Pepsi is cause of this women being poor- thinking maybe it should e Nominated for Deletion or at least be renamed. Also theres no release from the women to use her in image. Gnangarra 06:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

there is no need for a permission, since she is barely recognizable (face almost completely covered, low res, ...) -- Gorgo 12:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Even if we consider that bothe the woman and the signs are main subjects of this picture, it does not imply that this woman is poor due to the impact of of first-world products. That POV is the uploader's interpretation, but not necesarily the creators neither any viewers. Other viewers may understand that proximity does not imply causality. This images are powerful symbols of concepts that contrast by its proximity (big companies market economy and poverty in India)--Javierme 19:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

•  Oppose In addition to everything already said the resolution is very low. Roger McLassus 09:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- poor composition -- Boereck 09:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose - as above -LadyofHats 22:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose low res -- Gorgo 12:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

2 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 07:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)