Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Paperbark Maple Acer griseum Bark 3008px.jpg

Image:Paperbark Maple Acer griseum Bark 3008px.jpg, not featured

#1 #2

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Ram-Man
•  Info Both images are of the same tree, but are not the same image. I think they are both beautiful but serve different purposes. One is a closeup showing extreme detail, the other provides more perspective. This image provides additional context. -- Ram-Man 02:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Picture #1, not featured

•  Support // tsca [re] 17:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator. -- Ram-Man 23:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Picture #2, not featured

•  Support // These two pictures are incredible. The detail... the vivid colors... and so life-like, it couldn't be more beautiful if you were looking at it in person. Well done. JL (UTC) Please log in to vote --Digon3 15:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment This is a vote from a friend of mine, User:Jina Lee, just learning how to use the Wikipedia/Commons. I didn't seek her vote on this and didn't want to push the issue to prevent allegations of ballot stuffing. -- Ram-Man 14:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral - I would prefer another aspect ratio, with the larger dimension in the direction of the trunk development. Alvesgaspar 18:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• I have another vertical shot, but it's not nearly as good. The only other option would be to crop it. -- Ram-Man

•  Support as nominator. -- Ram-Man 23:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great close-up detail, you can clearly see the texture & structure of the bark --Tony Wills 23:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 11:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)