Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Orchidacea Cymbidium.jpg

Image:Orchidacea Cymbidium.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2008 at 13:10:21

•  Info created by Flying Freddy - uploaded by Flying Freddy - nominated by Flying Freddy -- Flying Freddy (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Flying Freddy (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too busy background and in need of a cultivar name. Lycaon (talk) 13:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice Muhammad 06:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose As a very common florist's flower, sharpness and light should be much much better. --B.navez (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

You surely mean DOF, not sharpness, right? The flower that is actually in focus (lowermost) is almost obscenely sharp. --Aqwis (talk) 21:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I meant clearly sharpness cause I find the way it has been sharpened makes it odd. We could expect more details on the organs, not something whose colors seem to have been gently smoothed. --B.navez (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Support --Elucidate (talk) 21:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Nice shot; opposing comments don't concern me. How do you turn this on (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Twitchy background --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:22, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support-- DarkAp89  Commons 14:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per previous opposers--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 17:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per opposers. –Dilaudid 21:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment Could you try to be more specific with opposes, B.Navez's oppose I take is a issue with lighting as there is nothing wrong with sharpness although you could argue DOF. If you are agreeing with "twitchy background" could you please try to explain it a bit more precisely. Opposing comments should be an opportunity for a photographer to learn, but this is impossible if they don't understand the grounds of opposition.Flying Freddy (talk) 00:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Twdragon (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

result: 7 supports, 5 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)