Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:NGC7293 (2004).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:NGC7293 (2004).jpg, featured[edit]
- Info created by NASA, ESA, and C.R. O'Dell (Vanderbilt University) - uploaded by trialsanderrors - nominated by trialsanderrors 00:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Info This is the visible light version of this nomination. Another version is here. ~ trialsanderrors 00:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support ~ trialsanderrors 00:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support I like this version better than the infrared image --Digon3 02:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support me too --Simonizer 09:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. --Atoma 09:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support Very good. Raphael17 16:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Oppose and that. What is that? other version? --The Photographer 20:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)- Huh? The other version is a ground-based, infrared image. This one is a visible light version created as a composite of a set of Hubble and ground-based photographs. ~ trialsanderrors 22:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's a ireal picture then? --The Photographer 23:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Of course. Read the description. Why did you just nominate an astrological image if you don't know anything about them? ~ trialsanderrors 01:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
SupportOppose My English is low, your commentary of my Nebula is unjust, simply because I am against a seemed image, you comment out that negative to me?. I prefer the original image --The Photographer 02:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)- No because you can't even put a minimum amount of effort into informing yourself about criteria and policies or read up on the pictures you comment on. ~ trialsanderrors 04:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please, it is not the way to treat. I demand respect --The Photographer 12:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- No because you can't even put a minimum amount of effort into informing yourself about criteria and policies or read up on the pictures you comment on. ~ trialsanderrors 04:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Of course. Read the description. Why did you just nominate an astrological image if you don't know anything about them? ~ trialsanderrors 01:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Trialsanderrors, please don't be that harsh, The Photographer seems to be new here on commons. Furthermore everyone has the right to nominate pictures he likes, regardless if he understands the image description or not. It's a wiki. The voters will decide if it's FP or not. --norro 17:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's a ireal picture then? --The Photographer 23:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huh? The other version is a ground-based, infrared image. This one is a visible light version created as a composite of a set of Hubble and ground-based photographs. ~ trialsanderrors 22:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah seriously. Norro is right. Everyone can nominate any image they like. And don't be so harsh with newcommers. --Arad
- Support --norro 17:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support there is very little noise in this picture compared to, the converted tiff above. Lycaon 23:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Tone 10:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support --MichaelMaggs 22:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 08:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)