Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Muybridge race horse animated 184px.gif
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Muybridge race horse gallop animated.gif[edit]
Image:Muybridge race horse animated 184px.gif, featured[edit]
first, bad quality und unused version deleted now (request by uploader) --:Bdk: 08:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Nominate
—Yug 14:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Support —Yug 14:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC) - Beautiful, but a little too small (not 300px). Have we a solution ?- Support -- Excellent. This is some really interesting (and still useful!) work in the PD. Husky 15:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --che 16:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting, but i would like to have in in better quality or as artificial animation norro 19:20, 15 January 2006 (UTC) - Here you are! I don't know if it's a thoroughbred. --wau 22:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)- Support A lovely piece of history in motion --Piolinfax 10:56, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support our first FP animation! pfctdayelise 13:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Calderwood 16:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 01:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Look at the enlarged version. --wau 23:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC) - Now 300x200 px. --wau 20:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support agree with Piolinfax -- Godewind 11:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support was immediately impressed --Bjs 22:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: can the component pics be adjusted so (1) the the ground does not rise and fall, and (2) the horse stays about the same colour throughout, instead of some frames much paler? - MPF 16:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- That's true, the ground should be fixed at a certain level. I'm working on it. --wau 16:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- If the frames here are close to the original frames by Eadweard Muybridge, I wouldn't replace them: its's true it would be more physically accurate but it wouldn't be historically accurate. In case the frames could be corrected, what about editing them as a different file and linking it to this one as an edited version instead replacing it? --Piolinfax 11:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- I adjusted the position of the ground and changed the colours very little. See the improved version above. Unfortunatedly I don't have better copies. --wau 19:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- If the frames here are close to the original frames by Eadweard Muybridge, I wouldn't replace them: its's true it would be more physically accurate but it wouldn't be historically accurate. In case the frames could be corrected, what about editing them as a different file and linking it to this one as an edited version instead replacing it? --Piolinfax 11:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- That's true, the ground should be fixed at a certain level. I'm working on it. --wau 16:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Roger McLassus 18:21, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- specially the modified version, but the original also Tatoute 10:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Klemen Kocjancic 06:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support — modified version Lycaon 10:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Hein 08:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support — modified version (nice bit of work!) - MPF 15:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Classic early animation Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 16:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
RESULTS: 15
