Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Monument Valley 2.jpg

Image:Monument_Valley_2.jpg, Featured

•  Nominate

 --Huebi 18:52, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

•  Support Jon Harald Søby\^{no na} 19:32, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
•  Support lovely pic, great wideness. But a bit noisy in the sky. --SehLax 19:45, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support QuartierLatin1968 21:34, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support--Shizhao 03:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour 05:34, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- In desperate need of noise reduction in the sky and spot removal, otherwise a great pic. ADSR6581 08:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support, but would much prefer some noise reduction, yes. James F. (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support -- YolanC 12:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support -- Get_It (Talk) 15:46, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Support --PedroPVZ 23:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
•  Neutral agree with ADSR6581, too much noise which is strange because lighting there isn't that bad ;) (wrong iso-setting? bad camera?) -- Gorgo 23:33, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

ISO Setting? Hey, there are people having a camera, not a dumb digital micro box. I dont think that a camera like a Nikon F70 with a NIKKOR 20 mm 1.2 is a bad camera. But scanning slides isnt that easy as just getting the photo out of small, electronjic bad cameras. --Huebi 05:33, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

then maybe a bad scanner or whatever .. you have to admit that especially the sky is quite noisy (even in the small version). I like the picture though, but a noise reduction filter or a better scan could probably improve the quality :) -- Gorgo 01:39, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Scanning slides is more different then scanning pictures. I will see if i can inmprove this with some noise reduction filters. --Huebi 05:41, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

•  Support --Cyr 17:38, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
•  Support --BLueFiSH ?! 18:29, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

11 Support, 2 neutral => Featured --Shizhao 13:46, 8 September 2005 (UTC)