Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Masked owl head4443.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Masked owl head4443.jpg[edit]
InfoThis side on view shows the facial disks and "mask" quite well.Benjamint 12:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Support --Benjamint 12:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Due to aperture choice again. Dori - Talk 13:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)- A bigger DOF wouldn't have much, if any, difference because of the nature of the feathers, they had a very soft fuzzy look to them them that makes them seem OOF even when within the depth of field. Benjamint 13:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- While I couldn't be sure that a smaller aperture would have helped, I was looking at the parts on the out lie of the picture where the feathers melt/blur together, and become sort of whitish or brownish spots. I'm pretty sure that's due to DOF. Dori - Talk 13:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Possibly, I think that's just the pattern of the feathers, I havn't got any shots of the back of the bird to check.
- While I couldn't be sure that a smaller aperture would have helped, I was looking at the parts on the out lie of the picture where the feathers melt/blur together, and become sort of whitish or brownish spots. I'm pretty sure that's due to DOF. Dori - Talk 13:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Great picture -- Acarpentier 14:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose There is not too much detail on the face. Its overexposed and the homogeneous light doesnt help to shape the fine details , maybe a different lighting helps ? --Richard Bartz 21:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
