Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lake Fryxell.jpg

Lake Fryxell

 

Original version (left) - qualified but not featured

•  Info created by Joe Mastroianni - uploaded by Saperaud - nominated by Jhs
• Nomination Amazing picture. featured in the English Wikipedia. Jon Harald Søby 14:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Jon Harald Søby 14:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gnangarra 15:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC) either its FP material or it needs editing withdrawn Gnangarra 11:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - Tbc 17:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - jillian 2 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - MPF 23:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support MGo 09:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support--Shizhao 13:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Freedom to share 15:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support FML ^hi 18:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Francisco M. Marzoa 19:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- skINMATE 20:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Can someone please tell me what's so special about this shot? Please compare it to this version --Pumbaa 13:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
  •  Neutral It's beautiful, but the image you link to is even better ( Thats why I moved by vote down the enhanced version). /Daniel78 19:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Hm, I don't know. I like the ice in the foreground, but the upper half doesn't impress me. --Pumbaa 01:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose this image is lacking a sense of scale, and the hill in the background is too much in the shadow. --Dschwen 16:16, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral - great subject. Not that great photography. FP on Wikipedia, certainly, but here? --89.102.143.110 15:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Oonagh 03:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Prefer the edited version. —Pixel8 13:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Prefer the edited version too. --Wing-Chi 15:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Really excellent. The right one is slightly better. --Filip (§) 11:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support The ice has a more beautiful color in the edited version, but the mountain looks better in the original --Boivie 08:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour 05:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

12 support, 4 oppose --> qualified for promotion
but less so than edited version MGo 06:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

edited version (right) - featured

•  Info created by Joe Mastroianni - uploaded by Thomas G. Graf - nominated by Freedom to share
• Nominate Freedom to share 06:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Freedom to share 06:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
•  Comment Is this different to Image:Lake Fryxell.jpg? (scroll down the page) It looks rather the same to me. pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

It has more contrast and sharpness --Pumbaa 17:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

•  Support Mayamaxima 17:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support —Pixel8 13:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Wing-Chi 15:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose the edit has the same problems I stated above. I just do not like the composition at all. --Dschwen 06:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Greycard 06:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support This version is better. /Daniel78 22:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Hein 14:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Francisco M. Marzoa 15:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support / tsca @ 11:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- Charlax 13:43, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

---

Note: I trust the vote closer will have enough sense to only promote one of these images, even if both qualify. pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Otherwise the wrong additional promotion can simply be undone, because now we have a rule (see above). Roger McLassus 14:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

10 support, 1 oppose --> Featured MGo 06:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)