Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:KleifarvatnMorningInWinter.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:KleifarvatnMorningInWinter.jpg not featured[edit]
Sunrise (!! - for those who vote against sunsets - it is a sunrise ;-) ) at Kleifarvatn in Winter, Iceland
- Self-
Nominate
Andreas Tille 06:34, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Oppose Neither sharp nor spectacular Calderwood 08:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Support Mmmmmm pretty colors.... Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 14:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)- Oppose mmmmhh, I think it's leaning a bit and I still don't really like the scan quality. And the composition is good but not that outstanding as it was at your last geysir ;-) --SehLax 18:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- I observed that the scan quality of nearly all of my images is criticised. I admit that Kodak Photo-CD scan is definitely not optimal. When I edit my images using The Gimp I try to despecle the sky using a Gausian blur filter and "Unsharp mask" for details in the foreground. Perhaps someone knows a better method to enhance these PCD images. Thanks for the critical comments in any way. And by the way, this is not really a Geysir but a lake. If you look here I was standing about at the center of the beach on the left. Andreas Tille 06:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I just compared the composition to this one :-) --SehLax 18:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I observed that the scan quality of nearly all of my images is criticised. I admit that Kodak Photo-CD scan is definitely not optimal. When I edit my images using The Gimp I try to despecle the sky using a Gausian blur filter and "Unsharp mask" for details in the foreground. Perhaps someone knows a better method to enhance these PCD images. Thanks for the critical comments in any way. And by the way, this is not really a Geysir but a lake. If you look here I was standing about at the center of the beach on the left. Andreas Tille 06:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Strong support. Beautiful colours indeed. I particularly dig the two water surfaces that have a slightly different hue and texture to them when compared to each other (and the sky). Same thing with the snow and the clouds. Scan quality? Aahh, nit-picking, my brothers... I can always forgive a shortcoming if there's so much other stuff that is marvelous. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 05:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)- Oppose nice colours, but this alone is not sufficient for a featured picture Hein 17:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support - MPF 17:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Piolinfax 18:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Miskatonic 07:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support. villy ♦✎ 17:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose The colours are nice, but it lacks contrast. --Groucho 22:51, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- colours -- YolanC 02:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support Rodge500 20:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- skINMATE 22:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose → not featured Calderwood 07:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
