Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kissing Prairie dog edit 3.jpg

Image:Kissing Prairie dog.JPG

Original, not featured

•  Info Kissing Black-tailed Prairie Dogs
•  Info created ,uploaded and nominated by Mbz1
•  Support --Mbz1 02:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral wenn da dieser Hintergrund nicht wäre, wäre es ein volles pro geworden --Böhringer 10:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Emotional pro Funny that the right dog lifts his left foot overwhelmed --Richard Bartz 12:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support So cute! Vassil 12:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Neutral until the saturation is more natural Not only because it is cute, but because it is technically and compositionally good. --Digon3 ^talk 13:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Why not imagine to watch it with a pinkish brown sunglas? :-)) --Richard Bartz 20:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment What about with red category? --Beyond silence 13:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• I turned it blue. Vassil 14:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry to have to go against the current, but this image is oversaturated. The original has far more natural colours. Support (of course) when corrected. Lycaon 16:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Wouldn't this be an invasion of privacy? -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 18:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Because I am a sap for cuteoverload.com and animals cuddling. I like the unsaturated version as well. Arria Belli | parlami 18:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Can your correct red point under the left hand? --Beyond silence 21:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Red-point, color cast, unsharpness. It is cute though. -- Ram-Man 02:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Edit, featured

 Question For the colours, do you prefer like this? Vassil 20:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment Can your correct red point under the left hand? --Beyond silence 21:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• It's done. Vassil 22:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Me likey. --Digitaldreamer 21:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Good value. --Beyond silence 22:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 00:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
•  Support Ok. So cute! (Once again) Vassil 01:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I like the second one very much. Arria Belli | parlami 11:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Lestat 21:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Still very much over-saturated. -- Lycaon 18:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cute but unsharp. -- Ram-Man 02:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Urban 05:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Any but the first. --Digon3 ^talk 20:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC) copied from Edit3 --Simonizer 13:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured  Simonizer 07:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Why did you promote the Edit3 when Edit has that votes too? --Beyond silence 08:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Guess because the colours were not correct??? Lycaon 08:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Ack Lycaon --Richard Bartz 08:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Wrong count. 8 people supported this one. Digon3 said he supported all, but the first.--Mbz1 12:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

So edit 3 has 8 support-votes, too. So the situation is the same. Personally i find the colours in this version oversaturated. So i decided to feature the other version. But I dont know what to do in such a situation. The guidlines say we should feature only one picture of the same motif. So i decided to feature the last one. But if you dont agree with this decision, what else can we do? Should we consider a new nomination of both edits? --Simonizer 13:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Iam confused. I copy Digons Support vote and feature this one. --Simonizer 13:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Edit2, not featured

Just for Beyond Silence red spot is removed(I wish I knew how it came about in the first place)--Mbz1 22:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

Thanks, it is better for everybody! ;) --Beyond silence 22:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support--Mbz1 00:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
•  Oppose Unsharp. -- Ram-Man 02:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Edit3, not featured

I've been naughty and removed the onlooker in the background. Lycaon 14:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• How nice of you. Is it possible to remove wood also?--Mbz1 15:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

Doubleplus  Support Wonderful! --Richard Bartz 18:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Any but the first. --Digon3 ^talk 20:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support nice, ok --Böhringer 22:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Great moment. Good editing too. --Nattfodd 22:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment The reconstitution of the background tree is a great work! But a sign of the crime remains: the onlooker's tail... Vassil 12:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

hahaha, good Vassil, I missed that one. Thanks. I'll fix it. Lycaon 14:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose I don't like th colours. --Beyond silence 18:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry but there is nothing to 'like' about natural colours. That's how they are. Lycaon 18:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support The crime is perfect now! Vassil 21:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 22:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp. -- Ram-Man 02:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Sweet --Bergwolf 16:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (other version has more support votes)  Simonizer 07:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)