Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Infant smile.jpg

Info created by my mother: Mehregan Javanmard - uploaded - nominated by Arad --Arad 04:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support No FP on human infant right now and this one is very good. I't also has artistic value, the smile of the Infant and the direction of it's eyes (looking at brightness) and encyclopedic value (Infants, when doing nothing, look at bright objects). I also had a question. Why the image look so differently on IE than when I view normally? It look more bright on Internet explorer. It's probably because of Proof colors. But which one is the right color? --Arad 04:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the image is nice but resolution is too low. Also the right arm is cut. --Jacopo86 10:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - We need more resolution for a baby's face? It's useless if we have to scroll all around to see the whole face. I think the 2 million pixel rule is way too high, as discussed in the talk page. Anyway this one is actually big enough (in my opinion). --Arad 13:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose composition (arm cut off) -- Gorgo 15:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not quite sharp enough for a FP, I'm afraid.--MichaelMaggs 16:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does it qualify for Quality Image? Because it passes the requirements. --Arad 21:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If this image Image:Senescence.JPG can make it (with much lower resolution), this one also can. --Arad 22:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment That image was voted on a long time ago, when much lower resolutions were the norm. - MPF 23:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - October 2006. This is not a "Long time ago". It's very recent. --Arad 23:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't agree, Arad. This image Image:Senescence.JPG has a strong expression, which is missing in the nominated picture in my opinion. norro 23:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose I agree, the other picture is sharper as well and the contrast is impressive ~ <3 bunny 01:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Seems expressionless to me. Quality not too good. norro 23:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's too tough to say expressionless. So it seems it's rather personal taste. --Arad 23:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I love babies and they all seem beautiful to me. But this photo looks like a common snapshot, composition is poor (distracting foreground and background, harm cropped off) and sharpness in on the soft side. Not a FP for sure. Alvesgaspar 00:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose beautiful baby, but very distracting backround unfortunately. Improper perspective, it looks like there is coming some kind of antenna out of the babys head -- Simonizer 09:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - aha, a teletubby!! :-) (sorry, couldn't resist!) - MPF 21:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please be civil. That teletubby is me. (jk). --Arad 01:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --medium69 22:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 1 support, 7 oppose >> not featured (rule of the 7th day) Alvesgaspar 10:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu