Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:HH Alsterarkaden pano1.jpg

Image:HH Alsterarkaden pano1.jpg - featured

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Dschwen
•  Support --Dschwen 23:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Thermos 03:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great picture, but i dont like the vignetting in the right corners and i would prefer the alternative picture --Simonizer 06:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral - Excellent composition and technique. But those small stitching errors are a shame (ITY !) ... Alvesgaspar 11:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I fixed those after your comment on QI... --Dschwen 11:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • When the blanket is short if we cover the head the feet stay out (anonymous) - Alvesgaspar 14:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
    •  Question --Dschwen 14:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
    •  Info - Meaning that stitching is a trial-and-error process: you fix here and some other error comes out elsewhere. Alvesgaspar 14:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
      • I did not restitch, but performed 1px(!) cosmetics which do not lead to further apparent errors (apart from being retoches of course). Anyway, it's your vote... --Dschwen 15:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support The stitching on this is fine. As for the vignetting, I'd assume that's not vignetting at all but exposure variation in the sky due to the extreme wide angle of view. You can't really fault the picture for reproducing reality. Wow Factor: It's a fun, busy picture. I enjoyed scrolling at 100% looking in between the arches for variability. Geometrically speaking, the other picture is more interesting, but this one has more interesting content. -- Ram-Man 17:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)****
  •  Comment Like Ram-Man says, the busy details make it stand above the crowd - in in addition to superrior quality and great composition.--Thermos 20:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support sehr schön ! --Makro Freak 20:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support and no complaints about the size, either ... --MichaelMaggs 21:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Vassil 16 May 2007
•  Oppose Sorry, it's very great technically, but projection used resulted in way too unnatural looking picture. In addition to that, sky isn't as smooth as I'd have had expected. Benh 21:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

 Support The unnatural look doesn't bother me, it still looks good --Benjamint444 11:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

•  Support --Bergwolf 19:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice composition, but the colours are very strange, I have never seen such sky.. --Karelj 19:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Digitaldreamer 22:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

 9 support, 1 neutral, 3 oppose >> featured - Alvesgaspar 22:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)