Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:David Suchet.jpg

Info created by Phil Chambers - uploaded by Running - nominated by Arad --Arad 04:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I did a little edit. Sharpening and noise reduction --Arad 04:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Value, detail. --Beyond silence 09:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Bonjour Monsieur Poirot. A pity that the crop at right is so tigth, doesn't allow a clear view of all Poirot's little gray cells... Alvesgaspar 10:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
conditional Support postpro ? --Richard Bartz 14:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Support for other picture (edit)
Oppose - crop on the right bothers me Tbc 18:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop --Leafnode 23:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can you please add a Retouched Picture template and give credits for the edit ? I find this not very thankful, having no problem if you critizise my edit but if you use it you should give credits for the hard work (3h retouche) and the improvement. --Richard Bartz 14:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure. And I don't criticize your work .It very well done. that's why i used it. And you could just give yourself the credit too. It's open! But I have to agree with below that it has artifacts. I tried to remove some. Maybe you can help with that if you have a less compressed version (I'm sure you don't want to work 3h more, so I don't expect much) ;-) --Arad 01:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info created by Phil Chambers - uploaded n nom by --Richard Bartz 21:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Alles muß ich immer selber machen :) --Richard Bartz 21:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Like this one better - Husky ^{(talk to me)} 22:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Monsieur Poirot, where is your "moustache"? - Alvesgaspar 23:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll support it, but I'm still thinking if I liked the other one's color better --Leafnode 23:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think in this edit, his skin color looks unnatural and kinda dead. --66.36.133.67 23:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's not the youngest anymore, sooner or later. Greets to Montreal ... --Richard Bartz 23:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol. Well true. Greets to you too (In a few weeks, weather here is going to be horrible). I had a question: How did you find this version of the same picture? Did you create it or found it? And I'm also waiting for the darker version. Thanks --Arad 03:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created it and it was 3h of hard painting work. Richard Bartz 14:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow i will reupload a slight darker version, feeling too lazy today. --Richard Bartz 00:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I uploaded the darker version above. ;-) --Arad 03:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose JPEG artifacts and posterization (probably saved in lossy too many times), original image doesn't have as much of this (compare to [1]) Dori - Talk 04:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Beyond silence 12:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ziga 21:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think the color saturation is better above? Because that image is going to be FP in wikipedia and it's a much better idea to keep one image as FP on both Wikis. --66.36.153.240 17:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If there are any more irregularities on this vote, I will close it as invalid and you can start from scratch. Lycaon 09:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate lighting, DOF is so so --Richard Bartz 21:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Start from scratch. -Arad 22:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu