Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Crested Tern Tasmania.jpg

Image:Crested Tern Tasmania.jpg, Edit 1 featured

Original, not featured

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2008 at 11:15:32

•  Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 11:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Noodle snacks (talk) 11:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting subject and fantastic composition. -- Flying Freddy (talk) 11:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support, per above. --Aqwis (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support wow! this guy looks like he flew from a cartoon:) --Lošmi (talk) 16:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support fantastic --norro 16:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose A very nice composition, but excessive levels of noise especially present on the wings. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 16:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I am not really sure how to add an edit here, but Image:Crested Tern Tasmania (edit).jpg was a selective noise reduced version from the enwiki nomination ages ago. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --B.navez (talk) 14:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 01:34, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely shot, can't see any noise myself. How do you turn this on (talk) 19:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Ttox
•  Oppose - As Maximo: excessive noise in the wings and beak. Also, I would like to see a larger photo with more detail. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose for this size it isn't sharp enough and as Alves mentioned the noise isn't advantageous here, otherwise i have the strange feeling that the BG is fake overprocessed --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support-- DarkAp89  Commons 14:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Size of image and some noisy parts. --Karelj (talk) 22:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose per last three opposers. Lycaon (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful, but too noisy & unsharp :( –Dilaudid 21:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose beautiful, but not so sharp and noisy. By the way, if you could "spread" your nominations a little... I would appreciate, as it's likely I will close them, and it seems you are going to have a lot of them featured ! ;) Benh (talk) 22:06, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support It is pretty good, the bird is beautiful. Crapload (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Dori - Talk 02:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

result: 13 supports, 7 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured (waiting for results on edit1). Benh (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Edit 1, featured

•  Info Noise reduced version which I mentioned. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support It is pretty good, the bird is beautiful. Crapload (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Info The background is so blurred due to its large distance from the subject (have a look at the geocoding, its about 300 meters) Noodle snacks (talk) 09:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support-- DarkAp89  Commons 19:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Don't think the NR is doing any good here. Just removing detail. --Dori - Talk 02:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting image, good for common users, surely can be featured --Twdragon (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Mr. Mario (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Still noises are there. But the image is spectacular --Man On Mission (talk) 9:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support well done. —αἰτίας •discussion• 02:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- TanPhat Nguyen (talk) 04:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC).

result: 9 supports, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured — Lycaon (talk) 21:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)