Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Compact disc.svg

Image:Compact disc.svg, not featured

•  Info created by Sakurambo - uploaded by Sakurambo - nominated by Kulshrax --Kulshrax 11:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Kulshrax 11:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose SVG + embedded raster = sth not really useful.Masur 13:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose As above - SVG with raster graphic makes it inscalable. Herr Kriss 13:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment That is not necessarily true. The nature of the embedded bitmap makes it scalable, because even enlarged pixels will hold the same pattern, and blurriness would not be an issue. It have tried scaling it up to large (over 10,000x10,000 pixels) sizes in multiple graphics programs, and have been able to scale it up just fine. The embedded bitmap would only pose a problem if it was depicting something more photographic that needed to remain sharp and undistorted, which, again, doesn't appear to be the case here. Kulshrax 14:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nice pic. But scaled on the overview page it is not visible, only when i click on the image.---donald- 07:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
    • That's a common problem, I'm afraid. -- Sakurambo 11:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks for the nomination :-) I just wanted to point out that the embedded JPEG bitmap in this image is very blurry, so the pixels will be very hard to pick out no matter how much you scale it. The circular edges are formed using clipping masks, so they will render perfectly at any size. The SVG standard currently doesn't support tangential gradients, so an embedded bitmap is the only practical solution — compare this image (43 KB) with Image:CD-R.svg (5.61 MB) and hopefully you'll see what I mean. -- Sakurambo 11:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  •  Info I've just uploaded a slightly revised version with an SVG gaussian blur filter applied to the embedded JPEG. The pixels are now completely invisible at all scales. File size is now just 21 KB. -- Sakurambo 11:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Good Quality. ---donald- 07:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --typhoonchaser 03:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong  Oppose (svg + raster) --Szczepan talk  11:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Dont oppose without reason. That is not polite. Please say why you dont like the picture! --Simonizer 11:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Thanks --Simonizer 12:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
      • np. always at your service --Szczepan talk  13:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. I have no problem with raster in a situation where it works. /Daniel78 22:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose SVG + raster Roman 92 ^talk 09:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 21:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)