Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Colosseum in Rome-April 2007-1- copie 2B.jpg

Image:Colosseum in Rome, Italy - April 2007.jpg

#1 #2

• Info created and uploaded by Diliff, nominated by --norro 15:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

#1 - not featured

•  Support Amazing quality and very nice colours --norro 15:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Digon3 15:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Thermos 15:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Strong support  Support LOVE --Makro Freak 20:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 20:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Looks better than reality --LucaG 09:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Vassil 19 Mai 2007
•  Support Colors look fake, but this is probably because of the time of day the image was taken. -- Ram-Man 04:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• and if, i would say well done fake :) --Makro Freak 15:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Alvesgaspar 11:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose very nice, but I think the second is a little bit better -- Gorgo 13:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment I think all those people would have voted for the second one if it would have existed when they voted. --D-Kuru 03:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

 9 support, 1 oppose >> not featured (featured version #2 below) - Alvesgaspar 11:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

#2 - featured

•  Info I uploaled a modified version: I used Photoshop to suppress the "ghost" in the middle and some rubbishs.Perhaps it's less disturbing to see a garbage can than a ghost :-) I hope that the way I modified the description is correct.Vassil 12:27, 19 May 2007
•  Support With or without the "ghost" in the middle: this is an excellent image! -- MJJR 19:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Really nice. #1 OK too. — Xavier, 00:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support This one is fine too. No preference. -- Ram-Man 04:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I like the first one too, but the modified image is a little better. -- Florentriv 12:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support very nice -- Gorgo 13:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice image. There are though some relatively numerous 8x8px squares on the sky due to JPEG compression. --Atoma 18:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • they don't exist in the original image, maybe vassil can provide a version with less compression? -- Gorgo 13:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • You're right,I'm doing another version. Vassil 28 May 2007
•  Support --Simonizer 10:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support No preference, but I guess this one is better if it has one less "ghost". --Digon3 18:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Bergwolf 19:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --D-Kuru 16:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 21:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support OK, "Looks better than reality" a little better. --LucaG 19:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Digitaldreamer 22:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Jon Harald Søby 20:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

 14 support, 0 oppose > featured - Alvesgaspar 11:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)