Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Colorado River edit.jpg

Image:Colorado River.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by Adrille - uploaded by Adrille - nominated by Adrille --Adrille 11:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Adrille 11:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree w. Aqwis - too washed out colours. -- Slaunger 22:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 16:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Increased contrast/sharpened edit, featured

•  Info The original is horribly uncontrasty, so I adjusted the levels a bit and added some artificial sharpness. --Aqwis 15:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--Wisnia6522 15:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Better, but the knobs were turned too much for my taste looks overprocessed. The cats should be on this photo as well and as an aside I recommend adding geodata. -- Slaunger 22:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support This is better and very beautiful, and I don't think this is too much... it doesn't look overprocessed, it just looks colourful. Adrille 11:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Agree with Slaunger, it doesn't look natural now - Alvesgaspar 12:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support But categories are absent now... AKA MBG 12:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Muhammad Mahdi Karim 15:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversaturated and lacks sharpness. Also the writing on the rock in the bottom-left corner is distracting. (some sneaky new way to watermark images? j/k ;) ) Rocket000 20:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral Unfortunate oversaturation. RedCoat 15:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support This is the best of the four images shown as of 12.10.07--Wrspiers 05:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support good composition and value --Beyond silence 10:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unrealistic colours --Herrick 12:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nice and I think this is the best edit. /Daniel78 23:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis 20:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => featured --Simonizer 10:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Increased contrast/sharpened edit 2, not featured

•  Info Tried to make a version not too oversaturated. _→AzaToth 19:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Shadows are now too purple. Calibas 20:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Hehe, as I've never been there, I don't really know what colors there should be. _→AzaToth 23:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support It is better. It is not so monotonous color :) --AKA MBG 09:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much. Parts of the rock at the right now seem to be overexposed. --norro 21:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree that right side rock overexposed. Left side too saturated in magenta and cyan and river too blue, foliage too green.--Wrspiers 05:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 10:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Colorado River-edit.jpg, not featured

•  Support Major use of curves, a handful of smart sharpen, and a dash of color balance. Calibas 03:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overall, image is too yellow. I believe image 2 is a truer representation.--Wrspiers 05:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer 16:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)