Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ColapteryxVirgo.jpg

Image:ColapteryxVirgo.jpg - featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sanchezn -- Sanchezn 19:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sanchezn 19:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now. Too many stains otherwise very good picture. I will change to Support when this is corrected --Simonizer 21:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes it's true, but I choose to give the full size picture, even if with an half sized one the quality could seem better (now if someone needs a scaled down version he can do it by himself). Sanchezn 22:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Iam not talking about the noise. Iam talking about the dust spots. You can clone them out easily without scaling the picture down --Simonizer 07:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now. Great picture --Simonizer 16:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support, there are indeed quite a few dust spots. --Aqwis 22:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Mww113 23:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral I could use less dust spots, great shot though. May I suggest something slightly less that max jpeg quality? Kinda defeats the purpose of jpegs. --Calibas 23:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• This is a 10 mPix picture, and at 3 megs, it's probably been compressed with quality setting slightly above 90. Benh 06:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

• OOps sorry, apparently, Lycaon compressed it to 3Megs. Benh 08:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

•  Support --Calibas 03:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

•  Support -- Great insect picture -- Alvesgaspar 07:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Spots (and noise, btw) gone. Lycaon 12:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks Lycaon (for the support of course, what else? :-)) Sanchezn 15:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer 14:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support The picture was taken in such an acrobatic way ;) I'd say the NR by Lycaon has removed a bit a tiny details on the "body", but overall it's probably better this way. Benh 15:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 18:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Honza Beran 17:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Richard Bartz 11:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

12 support, 0 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 22:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)