Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cliff Palace-Colorado-Mesa Verde NP.jpg

Image:Cliff Palace-Colorado-Mesa Verde NP.jpg, not featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tobi 87 (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tobi 87 (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Cliff Palace in Mesa Verde National Park is thougt to be the largest cliff dwelling in North America. It was built by the ancient Pueblo people (Anasazi) in the 12th century.
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Vassil (talk) 21:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Even if there's shade, it's still good.Mrmariokartguy (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty sure the shade is the point - these are in the middle of the desert, more or less. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Javier ME (talk) 16:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- DarkAp89  Commons 13:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Tintero (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --B.navez (talk) 14:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral, a very interesting subject, but it is too oversharpened for me to support. If this was done to conceal poor sharpness (detail), I would recommend rather downscaling it than sharpening it excessively. --Aqwis (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low quality, overexposed etc.... --Karelj (talk) 19:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree with Aqwis, and don't see where it's oversharpened, but I also think it's slightly overexposed (this is debatable). This isn't my reason to oppose though. Just that the people give it the "casual shot" touch, and kill it IMO. Benh (talk) 19:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. Lycaon (talk) 22:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see any overexposure. That may be just the color of the rocks under the sun. —La Pianista ^(T•C) 01:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very interesting subject, great location, very good composition. I do like people there since they give a great sense of scale. I do not think it is oversharpened. I am fine with the amount of details too. But highlights are overblown. I just checked a histogram of a highlight, and clearly it is overexposed, by a significant margin. I feel sorry, I truly do, but I see no other choice but to vote against it because of this regrettable but substantial technical mistake of the photographer. Barabas (talk) 01:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. MozillaMan_(talk) 19:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

result: 9 supports, 6 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC)