Support Could have a little more depth of field, but a cute photo, with a nice bit of spontaneity. Not really encyclopædic, but the Commons FPC isn't overly concerned with that. Wouldn't want too many dressed-up pets as featured pictures, mind. Adam Cuerden00:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SupportThat dog's head dress reminds me about one man, but the dog really looks much better than that man did.--Mbz100:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Neutral I might give my support when I see the hand-written (by that guy here) permission, in which is stated that you are allowed to publish this photo on the internet. You know German laws are very strict concerning such things. ;) --AngMoKio11:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I Cannot agree. Look for, example at this Silky Terrier. She was not with kids, but with an elderly womam. I asked her why the dog dressed up like that ans she explained to me that dog's eyes are sensitive to light and sunglasses help. Of course as soon as I posted the picture to Toy Dogs page user Jerazol removed it for "vandalism". I still cannot understand what the "vandalism" was - the dog dressed up or my picture at the page, but who cares there are many other things that I cannot understand about Wikipedia.--Mbz117:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Oppose Cute, but not spectacular. We are dropping photos of animals because there is something artificial in part of the background, and now herw we have the artificial elements right in its face :) I think it's dangerous to promote a picture of a manipulated animal (even though in this case it was supposed to be fun for the dog as well), and only very good and/or informative photographs of this practice (like Image:NMMP dolphin with locator.jpeg) should be featured. Anyway, thanks for introducing a fresh theme into this election. --Javier ME21:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
CommentAs you guessed, this nomination was not serious nor encyclopedic. It was my farewell-picture, designed to make you a little bit happy, and i think this list really needs it :). I started doing my public domain macro-photography project here on Wikimedia exactly 8 weeks ago, and in that time i contributed more than 150 pictures, where 24! of them surprisingly earned featured picture promotions. So this encyclopedic thing has come to an end for me, and i am heading for new interesting, unencyclopedic ;) photography projects beyond Wikimedia. A lot of respect goes to Alvesgaspar, Ram-Man, MBZ1 - she should be my bold substitute;), Simonizer, Michael Maggs, Digon3, LC-de, Digitaldreamer on ICQ, Lycaon, Luc Viatour, AngMoKio, MichaD | Michael Apel!, Böhringer the very hot newcomer! and all the users who spend their precious time with Wikimedia. So forget this nomination and post some funny comments until its running out. Best regards, Richard aka --Makro Freaktalk12:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
hmm..too bad..we would lose a high-quality contributor. Have you ever thought of contributing non-macro pictures? Wouldn't that be a challenge? You would leave without giving me one single supporting vote...anyway I will miss your oppose's ;) --AngMoKio13:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for contributing with all those good images! Is there a specific reason for leaving, or just moving on... ? /Daniel7822:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In der Zwischenzeit kannst du ja für mich weitermachen, der Sommer fängt gerade an, und im Herbst gehts eh wieder hoch aufn Berg, da kannst du denen hier mal zeigen wie schön es bei uns in/an den Alpen ist ! --Makro Freaktalk23:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Makro Freak, I strongly believe you should have supported few of my pictures, if you are leaving anyway(I hope everybody understans I'm kidding, but I'm not sure everybody does). I'm going to miss you, Richard. I wish you good luck with whatever you up to. I'm sure sooner or later you will come back with new great pictures.--Mbz115:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Du kannst deinen Username auch einfach ändern. Dann kannst du auch anderes außer Makros hochladen. Wenn du es nicht mehr brauchst kannst du mir ja das MP-E 65 schicken. Ansonsten viel spaß bei deinen weiteren Photoexkursionen. Mit oder ohne Wikipedia. --MichaD | Michael Apel15:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info created / nominated by --Makro Freak talk 21:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Support --Makro Freak talk 21:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose You're kidding.... right? -psylexic
Agree As per Adam. (Why does "Audrey Hepburn" pop into my mind?) --Digitaldreamer 11:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Neutral I might give my support when I see the hand-written (by that guy here) permission, in which is stated that you are allowed to publish this photo on the internet. You know German laws are very strict concerning such things. ;) --AngMoKio 11:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment As you guessed, this nomination was not serious nor encyclopedic. It was my farewell-picture, designed to make you a little bit happy, and i think this list really needs it :). I started doing my public domain macro-photography project here on Wikimedia exactly 8 weeks ago, and in that time i contributed more than 150 pictures, where 24! of them surprisingly earned featured picture promotions. So this encyclopedic thing has come to an end for me, and i am heading for new interesting, unencyclopedic ;) photography projects beyond Wikimedia. A lot of respect goes to Alvesgaspar, Ram-Man, MBZ1 - she should be my bold substitute;), Simonizer, Michael Maggs, Digon3, LC-de, Digitaldreamer on ICQ, Lycaon, Luc Viatour, AngMoKio, MichaD | Michael Apel!, Böhringer the very hot newcomer! and all the users who spend their precious time with Wikimedia. So forget this nomination and post some funny comments until its running out. Best regards, Richard aka --Makro Freak talk 12:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
:) --Bergwolf 21:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:) --Makro Freak talk 22:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
