Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Canada goose flight cropped and NR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Canada goose flight cropped and NR.jpg - featured[edit]
Info created by Alan D. Wilson — uploaded by Diliff — nominated by Atamari
Support Atamari 23:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support
Oppose Problem licence to see coment of the user Wikimol --Luc Viatour 09:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Gordo 09:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely beautiful! --Tomascastelazo 13:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Erina 15:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support despite small size - MPF 15:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Tone 20:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Tarawneh 00:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Jacopo86 09:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Ziga 20:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Wongsamuel 04:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support WHOHAAA! --Jollyroger 14:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support
El Comandante
Hasta ∞ 17:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 
Strong support — Love the bokeh. Indon 10:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)- Support - There is not only lab picture ! :-) Declic 12:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment - the copyright info is strange. The original is copyrighted by Alan D. Wilson, www.naturespicsonline.com, under cc-by-sa-2.5. The edit by Diliff was marked as self-published (is it suitable in case of minor edits?), dual-licensed under gfdl, and the website name disappeared from the authorship info. --Wikimol 11:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)- Oppose As in many other cases before, my opinion differs from the community's mainstream. The coincidence of the bird's upper boundary with the line of apparent horizon is a considerable compositional flaw. In addition to this the lower parts of the right wing are somewhat blurred. Roger McLassus 19:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support. About the license, just drop Diliff a note, I'm sure that's a non-issue. The composition is ok, the flaw Roger pointed out is not grave at all (IMO). The apparent horizon is not a line, it is significantly blurred, and doesn't make the subject stand out less at all. The shot is good enough and with a subject like this, I suppose you don't really have the luxury of composition... --Dschwen 21:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Agree small size but great --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 00:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Neutral small size balanced by rarity and technical merits. Lycaon 05:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
16 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured Roger McLassus 07:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
