Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:20050827 South Gippsland Hills In Morning Mist.jpg

Image:20050827 South Gippsland Hills In Morning Mist.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by Ian Fieggen - uploaded by Ian Fieggen - nominated by Ian Fieggen -- Ian Fieggen 00:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ian Fieggen 00:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer 22:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment It's a very nice panorama which reminds me one of my favorite on commons, but resolution is very low, and I'm afraid it might fail because of that. -- Benh 07:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: too small (< 2Mpix)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

 See new version immediately below...

Image:20050827 South Gippsland Hills In Morning Mist 2.jpg, not featured

•  Info Here's an un-cropped version, which is greater than 2Mpix. The above had been cropped to what I felt was better proportions and composition, but which unfortunately fell below the minimum requirements. Ian Fieggen 23:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ian Fieggen Ian Fieggen 23:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy, average detail.

Sorry, you should try Commons:Quality images candidates first! Please reneame without random numbers! --Beyond silence 11:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

• Random numbers? Do you mean the date at the start of the name? --WikiWookie 12:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• "

Sorry, you should try Commons:Quality images candidates first!"? Sorry, I know the quality of my camera probably isn't up to the standard of "Quality Images", but I thought this section was for "Featured Images", which is primarily about the image itself. Ian Fieggen 00:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• Then again, having seen how my picture compares to the one mentioned by Benh, I'm humbled by the other's much higher quality, even if mine has similar "wow". Oh well, I thought it was one of my best contributions, but apparently not worthy of featuring. Ian Fieggen 02:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mywood 12:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)