Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yokohama Stadium.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Yokohama Stadium.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2022 at 18:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created by Chme82 (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC) - uploaded by Chme82 (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC) - nominated by Chme82 -- Chme82 (talk) 18:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Support -- Chme82 (talk) 18:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Nice view but the lighting is not really good and the drop of quality in both sides is not at FP level, sorry --Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)- Oppose per above but a nice photo and QI, just the same. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Apart from the quality issues I do miss an elaborate composition here, the cut-off buildings on all sides make the framing look arbitrary. --Kreuzschnabel 21:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment I don't see why the lighting should be bad - otherwise it wouldn't be a quality picture. The quality also decreases only imperceptibly at the edge of the picture. This picture conveys an impressive atmosphere and is, in my opinion, the best picture of the Yokohama Stadium on Commons. But of course the decision is up to you. Chme82 (talk) 21:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment "Best in scope" is a COM:VIC argument. If you're convinced it's best in that scope, please nominate there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Kreuzschnabel, a good QI but IMO not an FP level composition Cmao20 (talk) 23:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)- Oppose per others. Maybe with a higher angle and better light, but as is this looks like just another picture of an outdoor stadium in a typical cityscape. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I withdraw my nomination because it seems impossible to me to get enough positive votes. The nomination of the picture was based on my assessment that in terms of "wow effect", composition and quality, my picture is within the range of recently promoted pictures. I would be happy to receive more substantiated feedback for future nomination: In order to make better pictures, I would like to know what exactly has to be done better regarding lighting or what exactly needs to be improved in the composition. Thank you. Chme82 (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Chme82 (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
