Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter Palace Panorama 4.jpg

File:Winter Palace Panorama 4.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2016 at 05:47:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Winter Palace Panorama 4.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter Palace Panorama 4.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created and uploaded by Florstein - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I find this composition very restful and pleasant for the eyes, and the Winter Palace is a lovely building. Surprisingly, there is as yet no Featured Picture of this palace. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Colours look severely oversaturated for me, especially the blue water and the red things in front of the building. Unbalanced composition with an adjacent building to the left and none to the right, a bit more slanted perspective from the right could compensate for that. --Kreuzschnabel 07:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support works for me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 22:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel; it also looks to me like it might be slightly tilted. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I didn't notice. Florstein, if you notice anything, feel free to edit with notice to everyone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment No, I'm sure that the picture is not tilted, but the embankment sagged a bit in the center. And no, I can't build a building in the right side to make symmetrical composition. :) And no - we need strictly frontal view for this building. --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support It is OK for me --Llez (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment About stitching errors. Alas, stitch a running water without errors at all is almost impossible, I bet you know. However, these smallest flaws are hardly visible and attempts to clone up the seams may equally affect the quality. This is a very big niggle, I guess. --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 20:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 19:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --KSK (talk) 11:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 20:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 02:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture