Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wernerite - Fluorescence.gif

File:Wernerite - Fluorescence.gif, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2014 at 11:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wernerite - Fluorescence.gif Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wernerite - Fluorescence.gif

•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 11:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Question Has the resolution been increased? The Text looks blurry and aliased. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info No, and the sharpness in the two originals was better. But for animating I had to lap them and edit them as animated gif which unfortunately lead to some loss of quality in respect to the originals. --Llez (talk) 12:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't think animated GIFs can be featured. Just too primitive. They don't print. And any decent website could have a mouse-over or button-click JavaScript animation to achieve the UV comparison that would be much less annoying. -- Colin (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Please upload as JPEG and nominate as image set. -- Rillke^(q?) 09:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)